Prosecutorial Discretion In Public Policy - 966 Words

So DACA affects a many different immigrants from all parts of the world not just the Hispanic population. To really get an understanding of how the current public policy DACA has come into play. We first must know its origins. According to Wadhia, (2015) â€Å"Prosecutorial discretion in immigration law refers to the decision the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)1 makes about whether to enforce the immigration law against a person or a group of persons.2 When an immigration officer from DHS chooses not to bring legally valid charges against a person because of the persons family ties in the United States or other equities, prosecutorial discretion is being exercised favorably.3 But prosecutorial discretion is not just limited to†¦show more content†¦citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) child born on or before November 20, 2014; unlawful status on November 20, 2014 and on the date of application; that they are not an enforcement priority for removal; and that they pose no other factor that in the exercise of discretion would deem DAPA inappropriate†. The second change, was the expansion of DACA program. The third change to DHS’s enforcement priorities. The new priorities memorandum included, according to Wadhia, (2015), â€Å"New priorities memorandum, entitled â€Å"Policies for Apprehension, Detention and Removal of Undocumented Immigrants†(â€Å"November 2014 Priorities Memo), which set forth refined priorities for immigration enforcement†¦ (1) individuals who pose threats to national security, border security, and public safety, including many individuals with felony convictions and aggravated felony convict ions; (2) misdemeanants and new immigration violators, including recent entrants and those convicted of a significant misdemeanor;14 and (3) individuals with other immigration violations including those who have received a final order of removal on or after January 1, 2014†. The opposing coalition consists conservatives’ states and their perspective State Attorney General and the Presidents National Diversity Coalition. According to Paxton (2017), â€Å"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, nine other state attorneysShow MoreRelatedDiscretion Within The Criminal Justice Process1667 Words   |  7 PagesDiscretion in policing and the court system is a necessary and unavoidable facet of criminal justice work, yet it is still very controversial. Discretion exists when courtroom actors (police officers, attorneys, judges) have the flexibility to choose an appropriate response to a situation. Police discretion is defined as â€Å"The opportunity of law enforcement officers to exercise choice in their daily activities† (Nowacki, 2015). This means that actors with a great deal of discretion at their disposalRead MoreAutomatic Transfer Law: An Effective Policy? 1171 Words   |  5 Pagescriminal offense. The automatic transfer law is the policy that is used most commonly, in regards to transferring a juvenile to criminal (adult) court. In the 1980s there was a peak in juvenile crime, and there was public outcry that juveniles were plaguing the society with their criminal behavior. Terms such as juvenile super predator and crime time bomb was used to describe the increase in youth crimes. These terms created extreme fear in the public and demanded action are taken against youth offendersRead MoreIndustrialization And Social Change During World War II3764 Words   |  16 PagesSince the founding of the founding of the United States in 1776, American law enforcement has evolved significantly. As the US developed and changed, the criminal justice system changed and experienced different focuses in operation. Since the first public police organization was founded in 1844 to today with 90% of all American of municipalities with a population of 2,500 or more having their own police forces, the US policing complex has seen many changes (Eskridge 81). Urbanization and social changeRead More Self-defense in Criminal Cases Essay2630 Words   |  11 Pagesis because the parties are more likely to settle lopsided cases out of court. Public prosecutors, by contrast, win far more than 50 percent of their trial cases because they have budget constraints and so elect whenever possible to go to court with only the cases they are likely to win. Victims should be allowed to hire private attorneys and other professionals to prepare cases against the accused and thereby extend public prosecutors resources. The attorneys can be retained pro bono (for the good)Read MoreLiterature Review : Law On The Books 855 Words   |  4 Pageshandle, and â€Å"protecting communities from these offenders may be the most emotionally and politically charged challenge for the criminal justice system† (Dickey Hollenhorst, 1999). Though most states had statues targeting career criminals, policy makers and the public continued to push for harsher punishments for repeat offenders during the twentieth century (Brown Jolivett e, 2005). As a result, strict sentencing laws were enforced, such as, three strikes, that required a person convicted of a felonyRead MoreRacial Disparity in Sentencing1914 Words   |  8 Pagesflourishing continuance of racial disparity in the criminal justice sentencing process are ineffective assistance of procedural bars, and council, jury selection and venue, prosecutorial discretion, and juror racism (Tabak, 1999, p. 6). Research documenting states like New York and California prosecutions have board spectrums concerning discretion seeking capital punishment; however, these four reasons apply to cases, which capital punishment is sought. â€Å"Capital punishment can be sought for intentional murdersRead MoreRape And Burglary As A Post Incarceration Supervision1730 Words   |  7 Pagesand burglary as strikes for purposes of imposing a life sentence without parole (Sutton, 2013). Mandatory minimums take away the discretion of the judge in sentencing. These officials are boun d by statute to place offenders behind bars. Because these statutes are put into place, the judge is not allowed to hand down alternative punishments, nor do they give them the opportunity to prescribe treatment or a change to rehabilitate. Such laws also hold racial discriminatory factors (USSC, 2011). DeterminateRead MoreDemocracy And Its Impact On Democracy1329 Words   |  6 PagesStephenson, Matthew. Rule of Law as a Goal of Development Policy, he states: â€Å"All government officers of the United States, including the President, the Justices of the Supreme Court, state judges and legislators, and all members of Congress, pledge first and foremost to uphold the Constitution. These oaths affirm that the rule of law is superior to the rule of any human leader. At the same time, the federal government has considerable discretion: the legislative branch is free to decide what statutesRead MoreCriminal Law Foundations evaluation paper1641 Words   |  7 Pagesnormally not given to minors in the juvenile system. For a juvenile to be free before adjudication, he or she must prove, they are not a flight risk or a further danger to society. Juvenile courtrooms, unlike adult courts are also not open to the public or media because of preserving the privacy of minors in the system (Just Cause Law Collective, 2007). Oddly, punishments for juveniles for smaller offenses are sometimes more strict than an adult would face. Probation sentences can be much longerRead MoreShould Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Be Legal?3705 Words   |  15 PagesIssue Statement â€Å"Like the ancient tension between fixed and indeterminate sentencing, there’s an ancient debate about judicial discretion in sentencing.† Proponents argue that mandatory minimum sentencing can place a significant hardship on correctional budgets while at the same time, threatening an increase of an inmate’s claim that their rights pursuant to the Eighth Amendment protection of cruel and unusual punishment have been violated. Opponents of fixed sentencing tend to posit that mandatory